![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/WBlab.jpg\" "\\"Warner")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
A current snapshot of Union Labs and the Still Lab Technicians of Local 683<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Tell me if you\u2019ve heard this one. When unit stills shifted from film to digital capture, an independent producer contacted Danielle Straughn, then VP of the Hollywood-based lab, Studio Photo Imaging. He was irate about a bill and demanding answers. Straughn, a veteran customer service rep, calmly explained that the production received sets of proof sheets, printed from RAW file conversions of the unit photographer\u2019s work. \u201cBut,\u201d the producer stammered, \u201cthis is digital. It\u2019s free!\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s easier to find humor in such stories now that the era of digital photography is marking its 10th anniversary.\u00a0 But when the change from film to digital first arrived, no one at IATSE Local 683, Laboratory Film\/Video Technicians and Cinetechnicians, was laughing.\u00a0 Ironically it was the speed of distributing images digitally (irresistible when dealing with deadline-driven news and media outlets), and not advances in digital photography that started it all. How ironic, then, that the front end of the process, acquiring the images, appears to be stabilizing while the dilemma of what to do with the images after capture continues to remain in flux.<\/p>\n And since Hollywood\u2019s best Union photo labs work with photographers (for digital capture) and publicists in film marketing departments (for digital distribution), they were and remain ground zero for the many changes shaking this part of the film and television industry.\u00a0 As both a unit publicist and freelance photo editor, I have tremendous respect for the way our Union labs continue to moderate, support, balance and strengthen these dual roles.\u00a0 And the labs are speaking up, too.<\/p>\n Shifting Tools\u2014Maintaining Value<\/strong><\/p>\n Perhaps the best barometer of change has been in the distribution of press kit images – those key publicity shots seen mostly in magazines and newspapers that help to sell audiences worldwide. Black & white prints and color transparencies were replaced by digital files (scanned from color negative and early digital photos) and sent out on CD, which were then accompanied by graphics in a CD-ROM press kit, which then migrated to on-line distribution with no physical component at all. And guess who used to make a living at providing all those physical photographic materials?<\/p>\n \u201cWhen I go into a lab now,\u201d observes Scott George, Local 683 business representative, \u201cthere are no longer as many people, they aren\u2019t processing film and I don\u2019t smell any chemicals. All I see are large screens and wires. But the good thing is these labs have evolved and survived the change. Local 683 members went and got the necessary training – sometimes with their own time and money \u2013 and kept themselves relevant. They found their niche and now work in technology at a very high level.\u201d<\/p>\n George says there are currently six labs signatory to Local 683: Kimaging, Paramount Pictures Photo Lab, Studio Photo Imaging, The Lab @ Film Solutions, Warner Bros. Photo Lab, and West Coast Photo. Out of the Local\u2019s 1,100 members, approximately 4.5 percent are still lab technicians. Perhaps one of the most unsettling things about the digital revolution in photography is the prolonged period of reorganization that followed. \u201cLast year was horrible, so everybody pulled back, not spending as much, or looking at ways to not do as much,\u201d remarks Greg Dyro, Director of Warner Bros. Photo Lab, which, like Paramount Photo Labs, is situated on the Company\u2019s studio lot but does work for outside clients as well. \u201cWe are constantly having to ask, \u2018How can we do this more efficiently?\u2019 because that\u2019s what clients are demanding. In the digital realm, we have systematically lost staff because it requires less people to do things.\u201d<\/p>\n But going it alone, without the assistance of a Union photo lab, inevitably spells trouble, according to Pam Lord, General Manager of West Coast Photo, who says that, \u201cpeople experiment with doing it themselves, and then they realize that they don\u2019t have the manpower with knowledge and expertise, the equipment or the speed.\u201d<\/p>\n Or as Ellen Showalter, Supervisor of Photographic & Digital Imaging Services at Paramount Pictures Photo Lab describes: \u201cYou\u2019ll have 20,000 images shot, with 1,000 routed for approvals that boil down to 200-300 for the key set of images. You still have the remaining 19,000 unapproved images that need to be securely stored. And that\u2019s 19,000 times two since there is a RAW file and a JPEG.\u201d<\/p>\n Showalter says history proves the remaining images retain value. \u201cIn the three years I\u2019ve been here,\u201d she adds, \u201cwe scanned images from The Godfather 8-9 times since there was a need for more images of Francis (Coppola) directing or sets and props images for licensing. We said, \u2018Let\u2019s scan everything instead of this hunt-and-peck method,\u2019 because you can never tell which ones of the extra stills you\u2019ll need.\u201d<\/p>\n She offers the example of a photographer who might do a crop, slight retouch, or color correction on an image and save it out as a JPEG, even though the RAW version is right next to it. \u201cA year later, that photographer is on another film,\u201d Showalter explains, \u201cand the ad agency wants the RAW file of the image. We have to know that it does or doesn\u2019t exist and locate the differently-named original RAW.\u201d<\/p>\n Kim Neelley, CEO of Kimaging insists it is better to have one central repository for the large files, with knowledgeable people who can provide efficient service. \u201cWhen money has been spent designing the one-sheet and getting it approved,\u201d Neelley notes, \u201cthere\u2019s frequently a deadline situation with 30 to 40 designers standing by, waiting for 200 RAW files so they can work through the weekend.\u00a0 I\u2019d make the argument that it\u2019s a good investment to rush file transfers because what you\u2019d pay us is much cheaper than what you\u2019ll pay for an hour of the agency people drumming their fingers. The vendor may not bill that directly, but the cost will be passed along one way or another.\u201d<\/p>\n The Photographer-Lab Collaboration<\/strong><\/p>\n Longtime Local 600 unit stills photographer John Bramley (I Am Number 4, Secretariat) says his relationship with Union photo labs hasn\u2019t really changed since the days he shot on film. \u201cThe shift basically involved working out a system where you could download reasonably quickly,\u201d Bramley explains. \u201cYou just send them the work in a little box now, a hard drive, instead of chasing around 40 rolls of film, and it still comes back from the lab in the form of proofs. You need to know that the images will be downloaded satisfactorily, safeguarded and backed up. But I have total faith and trust in them to do the work well, and to do it quickly.\u201d Lord posits that most unit stills photographers, after shooting for 16 hours, simply don\u2019t have the time to return to their hotels to download, convert and color-correct thousands of images. \u201cThey\u2019re shooting so fast, moving quickly from one side of the set to the other where lighting is changing, especially in action movies,\u201d she describes. \u201cThe files have to be balanced out and color corrected. We can get a hard drive with 8,000 images on it and I guarantee you we\u2019ve looked at every single frame.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIf everybody was using a point-and-shoot to grab some JPEGs,\u201d says Kevin Matossian, CEO of The Lab @ Film Solutions, which joined Local 683 in May, \u201cmaybe we wouldn’t be having this conversation. But we\u2019re talking about unprocessed RAW images that will be used to market and publicize your film from beginning to end. It is a major misconception to think that one person can handle all aspects of that process.\u201d<\/p>\n How Union Labs Add Value<\/strong><\/p>\n Here\u2019s a sampling of voices demonstrating why Union labs remain intrinsic: \u201cYou can\u2019t trust the camera to get exactly what you want,\u201d Neelley adds, \u201cbecause it\u2019s just a computer. There\u2019s no human judgment or artistic involvement. I don\u2019t think anyone on set would say, \u2018Let\u2019s take the imagery right out of the digital camera and project it in the theatre\u2026it\u2019s digital, it\u2019s perfect.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n Dyro observes that when a photographer and photo editor have a different vision, \u201cwe have to help mesh the two. A lot of times, what a photographer would pick to hang in a gallery is not the shot that reproduces very well in, say, People.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI think in the lower budget world,\u201d Matossian notes, \u201cthere is a misconception of how important still photography is. And that\u2019s tragic because it is the least expensive component for advertising such an expensive investment.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c(Labs) are unique in the business,\u201d Neelley chimes in, \u201cbecause we\u2019re involved with the images from the day filming begins until the DVD comes out. By doing conversions upfront, they remain on our server and the advantage is consistency, from proofs to prints to online. If you put images on a DVD and open it up to make a print, it\u2019s like going backwards to the days of using negatives and an enlarger when the quality of the print depended on the mood of the guy making it that day.\u201d<\/p>\n Neelley says the bulk of the income at Kimaging still comes from dailies, even after the switch to digital. (Every one of the labs profiled here has an in-house printer for producing the sets of proofs that are requested in addition to prints that may be needed for autographing or personal uses.) \u201cWe\u2019ve been watching as things move online to make sure the revenue offsets the change,\u201d Neelley adds.<\/p>\n Perhaps the biggest misconception about Union labs is that they\u2019re more expensive than somewhere else. \u201cWe\u2019re a commercial lab and our prices are just as competitive as anybody on the outside,\u201d Dyro states. \u201cIt\u2019s not higher just because it\u2019s Union wages and it\u2019s Union people.\u201d In fact, Lord notes that when digital came in and cut off a big chunk of the lab business, West Coast Photo raised their level of service to help facilitate the Studios that were also getting their departments cut. \u201cWe decided to ask, \u2018How can we help?\u2019\u201d Lord recalls. \u201cWe have many highly trained staff members on our payroll available pretty much around-the-clock. It\u2019s cost-effective.\u201d<\/p>\n Dollars and Sense<\/strong><\/p>\n Speaking of costs – to streamline workflow these days, unit still images are required to be accessible throughout established Studio systems, which have their own proprietary conventions.\u00a0 This is where multiple versions of digital asset management are popping up. Every studio and lab has its own variations, in various stages of development and usage; experts estimate there are some 1200 companies vying for a part of this technological convergence space.<\/p>\n \u201cImages take two paths after they are converted, corrected and uploaded,\u201d Matossian explains. \u201cAn online approval and digital asset management scenario, and the traditional printed method for whatever proofs or prints are needed. (The former) has definitely reduced the amount of printed materials, which saves money and the environment.\u201d<\/p>\n But advances in tech can also be a double-edged sword.<\/p>\n \u201cEverything in photography is consumer-driven,\u201d Neelley describes. \u201cCompanies like Kodak lost money on producing large machinery for labs that would help to drive the sales of Kodak paper, film and chemistry. We\u2019re now transferring to a new library that takes 800GB tapes and won\u2019t support the old 400GB ones.\u00a0 By the time I\u2019m done, I\u2019ll have $20,000 worth of tapes and a $10,000 library that\u2019s obsolete after only 2 \u00bd years.\u201d<\/p>\n Don Weinstein, who owned and ran other labs before coming to Studio Photo Imaging, says labs spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on new technology, \u201cand in this digital age, each of our high-end technicians is getting the most out of this equipment. Now, you can take the same machine and put it into different places, and it\u2019s the people who are actually doing the work who are making it as good as it can be. But, that\u2019s still an expensive overhead, so it takes volume to make it function.\u201d<\/p>\n Dyro says that like all other photo labs, WB is diversifying in order to boost income. \u201cAs part of the WB shops,\u201d Dyro notes, \u201cwe\u2019re also selling images out of the archives at wbphotocollection.com that we are producing and doing.\u201d<\/p>\n Studio Photo Imaging is addressing the regional production boom by placing sales reps in New York City, Albuquerque, Boston and New Orleans. \u201cThere are people who send us hard drives from around the city by FedEx, so it follows that we can also service films shooting out of town,\u201d Weinstein says.<\/p>\n In addition to going after more off-the-street business, Lord says West Coast Photo is running more B&W film and doing more fine art printing than they have in years. \u201cMany directors of photography and actors are shooting film for fun,\u201d she points out. \u201cWe\u2019re processing film, scanning it, and giving them digital images. But many of them like the results of film and they want custom fiber-based prints. Instead of adjusting an image on color paper to view as a black and white, we\u2019re doing lots of true black-and-white printing again. The fiber-based paper and resin-coated paper that we print on has a shelf life of at least 100 years. With digital prints, nobody yet knows for sure.\u201d<\/p>\n In fact, everyone in this industry is trying to gauge the future, with prints and with workflow models, and still lab technicians are partners for all of us in that search.<\/p>\n \u201cThe still lab technicians are a good group of people that deserve our support and the support of Local 600,\u201d George concludes. \u201cWhen I took office, I felt very strongly that it was important to focus on their needs. By redirecting work being sent to nonunion labs, and through a joint educational effort to reinforce that lab work needs to be done at labs so that people in both Locals get paid and stop losing jobs, I feel that everybody has done the right thing. It\u2019s better now than it has been in a while.\u00a0 Labs are now coming to us to discuss joining. I think that\u2019s as a direct result of work that\u2019s been done by many people. Tough times and more changes may come, but we keep moving forward.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0By Braden Wright<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A current snapshot of Union Labs and the Still Lab Technicians of Local 683<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4005,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-web-exclusive"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\nAnd in this new cost cutting era, Union labs have had to become more assertive in demonstrating their intrinsic value to both photographers and film marketing professionals. They\u2019ve had to dispel misconceptions and demonstrate how they strengthen relationships; how they add value, keep costs down, safeguard investments, help shoulder the workload and partner in these innovations. Thankfully, many in our industry are understanding all the ways they can benefit and profit from their interaction with Union labs.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/Showalter-West.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/Neeley.jpg\")
\nUnit photographer Scott Garfield (Priest, Love Don\u2019t Let Me Down), who made the jump to features and digital simultaneously, says the demand for instant access to his images has increased ten-fold. \u201cAlmost on day one they want to start releasing first-looks,\u201d Garfield states. \u201cPeople tend to think the minute they call \u2018wrap\u2019 I should be wrapped, but they don\u2019t take into account that it\u2019s anywhere from an hour to two hours to download, edit and email out sample photos people want to see.\u201d Garfield feels labs are even more valuable in the digital era. \u201cI\u2019ve had cards that crashed, and the people at West Coast have always been able to recover stuff that I thought for sure I\u2019d lost.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/Matossian-Eakin.jpg\")
\n\u201cWhen I first entered into this part of the industry, I was the first to say, \u2018I don’t understand why we can\u2019t just automate conversions,\u2019\u201d says Matossian, who came from a producing background. \u201cI won\u2019t say that we can\u2019t solve things through automation, because that\u2019s what we do. But I absolutely know that you cannot remove the human element. Especially when it comes to color corrections, decision-making or relationships.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/LoverroLord.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/Weinstein.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.icgmagazine.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/images\/lab\/GregDyro.jpg\")